The Intersection of Section 44AD, 44AB & Digital Thresholds
In India’s evolving tax landscape, the lines between compliance and complexity often blur — especially for small businesses navigating presumptive taxation and digital incentives. One recurring dilemma is:
Can a taxpayer escape tax audit under Section 44AB despite turnover exceeding ₹3 crore, if 98% of business is digital?
Let’s decode this through a structured analysis, with law interpretation, judicial clarity, and tax planning insights.
The Case Study of Mr. P: A Sole Proprietor in a Digital World
Consider the case of Mr. P, an individual trader and sole proprietor.
| Particular | Detail |
|---|---|
| Entity | Individual Proprietor |
| Turnover in FY 2024–25 (AY 2025–26) | ₹3.5 crore |
| Digital Receipts & Payments | 98% (via NEFT/cheques) |
| Net Profit | ₹35 lakh (i.e. 10%) |
| Presumptive Scheme Usage | Opted 44AD continuously from AY 2016–17 to AY 2024–25 |
| Books Maintained | Yes |
| Opted out of 44AD voluntarily? | No |
| Tax Return Filing | Regular ITR (not presumptive) in AY 2025–26 |
Legal Landscape – Understanding the Law
Section 44AD – Presumptive Tax Scheme
Under Section 44AD(1), eligible resident individuals, HUFs, or partnership firms (excluding LLPs) engaged in eligible businesses can opt to declare profits at:
-
8% of turnover (if cash),
-
6% (if digital),
…provided turnover does not exceed ₹2 crore.
From AY 2024–25, the Finance Act 2023 introduced a relaxation:
If aggregate digital receipts ≥ 95%, turnover limit is increased to ₹3 crore.
Mr. P's turnover = ₹3.5 crore ➝ He is not eligible for 44AD in AY 2025–26.
Section 44AD(4) – Lockout Provision for Voluntary Opt-Outs
This is a crucial section:
If a taxpayer opts for 44AD for any five consecutive years and then opts out, he cannot re-enter presumptive taxation for the next five assessment years.
And under Section 44AD(5):
If Section 44AD(4) applies, the taxpayer must maintain books under Section 44AA and get accounts audited under Section 44AB if total income exceeds the basic exemption limit.
Applicability to Mr. P:
-
He has not opted out voluntarily.
-
He is ineligible due to turnover exceeding ₹3 crore.
-
Hence, Section 44AD(4) is not triggered.
Supported by Case Law:
-
Yogesh Aggarwal v. ITO (ITA 373/Del/2021) – Ineligibility due to turnover does not amount to “opt-out” under 44AD(4).
-
CIT v. A.A. Builders (ITA No. 2342/PUN/2018) – Opt-out must be voluntary and not caused by statutory breach.
✅ Conclusion: Mr. P is not locked out under Section 44AD(4) and hence, Section 44AD(5) does not apply.
Section 44AB – Tax Audit Requirement
Every person carrying on business shall get accounts audited if turnover exceeds ₹1 crore [Section 44AB(a)].
However, 2nd Proviso to Section 44AB (effective AY 2021–22 onwards) provides relief:
If turnover is up to ₹10 crore and cash receipts & cash payments are both ≤ 5%, tax audit is not required.
✅ Mr. P’s status:
-
Turnover = ₹3.5 crore ✔️
-
Cash receipts = <2% ✔️
-
Cash payments = <2% ✔️
-
Digital compliance = 98% ✔️
Hence, tax audit is not required for AY 2025–26 despite turnover exceeding ₹3 crore.
Obligation to Maintain Books – Section 44AA
Regardless of tax audit exemption, Mr. P is required to maintain books of account under Section 44AA(2)(iv) because:
-
Turnover > ₹25 lakh, and
-
Net income > ₹2.5 lakh
Non-compliance attracts penalty under Section 271A: ₹25,000.
Strategic Insight – When 44AD(4) Can Be Used for Tax Planning
Many advisors view Section 44AD(4) as punitive. But it can also serve as a strategic lever:
If an assessee expects low-profit years ahead, it may be advantageous to voluntarily opt out of 44AD to enter regular taxation — even at the cost of the 5-year lockout.
This allows:
-
Claiming actual business expenses,
-
Carry forward of business losses,
-
Depreciation deductions,
-
Access to Chapter VI-A benefits.
✅ Tax audit becomes mandatory only if turnover > ₹1 crore and digital compliance < 95%.
🧾 This flexibility enables tailored tax planning, especially in volatile businesses.
Final Summary – Mr. P’s Position for AY 2025–26
| Condition | Status | Audit Triggered? |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible for 44AD? | ❌ (T/o = ₹3.5 Cr > limit) | No |
| Voluntary opt-out? | ❌ | No |
| 44AD(4) triggered? | ❌ | No |
| 44AD(5) applicable? | ❌ | No |
| Turnover > ₹1 crore? | ✅ | Yes |
| Digital compliance ≥ 95%? | ✅ (98%) | No (exempted via 2nd proviso to 44AB) |
| Books required under 44AA? | ✅ | Yes |
| Tax audit applicable? | ❌ No |
Compliance Action Points
-
File ITR-3, not ITR-4.
-
Maintain books even if audit is not applicable.
-
Document digital receipts to establish ≥ 95% benchmark.
-
Maintain consistency with earlier returns (44AD to ITR-3 shift).
Key Legal References
| Provision | Summary |
|---|---|
| Section 44AD(1) | Presumptive tax for T/o ≤ ₹2 Cr (₹3 Cr if digital ≥ 95%) |
| Section 44AD(4) | 5-year lockout on voluntary opt-out |
| Section 44AD(5) | Audit & books required if 44AD(4) triggered |
| Section 44AB | Audit required for T/o > ₹1 Cr unless 2nd proviso applies |
| 2nd Proviso to 44AB | No audit if T/o ≤ ₹10 Cr & cash < 5% |
| Section 44AA | Books required if T/o > ₹25L or income > ₹2.5L |
| Judicial Cases | Yogesh Aggarwal (Del), A.A. Builders (Pune) |
Conclusion: Digitalization is the New Audit Exemption
Mr. P’s case illustrates how judicial clarity + digital compliance + statutory interpretation work together to exempt taxpayers from audit — even with high turnover.
In the era of faceless assessments and data mining, proactive compliance with digital norms now serves not just as good practice, but as a strategic shield against procedural burdens.
