In Indian weddings, it is customary for parents of the bride or groom to receive monetary gifts, commonly referred to as shagun, from relatives and well-wishers. While culturally accepted as a token of goodwill, the Income Tax Act, 1961, scrutinizes such receipts for taxability. This article analyses the legal provisions, judicial interpretation, and implications arising from the landmark Punjab & Haryana High Court ruling in Rajinder Mohan Lal v. ITO (2013).
Statutory Provision: Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 56(2)(x) provides that:
"Where a resident receives, during any previous year, any sum of money... without consideration, the aggregate value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, such sum shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head ‘Income from Other Sources’."
However, the proviso exempts sums received:
"on the occasion of the marriage of the individual."
The statutory language is explicit in limiting the exemption only to the individual getting married, not to any other person, including parents or relatives.
Judicial Interpretation: Punjab & Haryana High Court (2013) in Rajinder Mohan Lal v. ITO
In Rajinder Mohan Lal v. ITO (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2013), the Court was confronted with the issue whether gifts received by the father of the bride on her marriage fall under the exemption.
Key findings of the Court include:
-
Literal Construction of the Statute:
The Court emphasized that the exemption under Section 56(2)(x) applies only to the individual on whose marriage the gift is received, based on the literal interpretation of the phrase “on the occasion of the marriage of the individual.” -
No Extension to Parents or Others:
The Court categorically rejected the contention that gifts received by parents are exempt merely because they are connected to the marriage of their child. -
Taxability of Gifts to Parents:
Since the parents are distinct persons, gifts received by them on the occasion of their child’s marriage do not fall within the exemption and hence are taxable as income from other sources. -
Burden of Proof on Assessee:
The assessee must prove that the gifts are exempt under law. Mere claim of gifts as shagun without documentary evidence is insufficient to exclude the amount from taxable income. -
Application to the Case:
The assessee, Mr. Rajinder Mohan Lal, had received gifts exceeding Rs. 21 lakh during his daughter’s wedding. Despite his claims of the gifts being shagun, the Department included the amount in his taxable income due to lack of exemption applicability and insufficient proof.
Legal and Practical Implications
-
Strict Scope of Exemption:
The exemption under Section 56(2)(x) is strictly personal and non-transferable. It applies solely to the bride or groom and not to their parents or any third parties. -
Need for Documentation:
Recipients of large wedding gifts should maintain adequate records—gift letters, bank receipts, and donor details—to support any claim of exemption or non-taxability under other provisions. -
Tax Compliance:
Undisclosed gifts or incorrect claims of exemption expose recipients to tax demands, interest, and potential penalties under Sections 271 and 271A of the Income Tax Act. -
Planning and Advice:
Given the rigid legal stance, taxpayers should seek professional guidance to structure gift receipts or use legitimate exemptions to minimize tax exposure.
Conclusion
The Rajinder Mohan Lal v. ITO ruling clarifies the legal position that gifts received by parents during their child’s marriage are not exempt under Section 56(2)(x) and are therefore taxable as income. This decision enforces a narrow but definitive interpretation of the law, emphasizing the importance of precise legal compliance and documentation.
Taxpayers and practitioners must be vigilant about the tax treatment of wedding gifts to avoid costly litigation and ensure adherence to the Income Tax Act’s provisions.
