By CA Surekha S Ahuja
Sec.6(1)(c) Interpretation, Strategic Implications for NRIs, Founders, and ESOP Holders
Introduction
The ITAT Bengaluru ruling in Binny Bansal vs DCIT (IT(IT)A No.571/Bang/2023, decided 9 January 2026) has fundamentally reshaped NRI tax planning in India.
Key outcome: The date of departure for employment abroad now dictates permanent residency status for all subsequent years, irrespective of the number of days spent abroad in future.
This is a decided case, not hypothetical, and is critical for:
-
Salaried employees working overseas
-
Founders and start-up executives
-
ESOP beneficiaries
Statutory Framework
Section 6(1) – Resident Determination
A person is a resident if any of the following conditions apply:
-
6(1)(a): Stayed in India ≥182 days in the FY; or
-
6(1)(c): Stayed ≥60 days in the FY and ≥365 days cumulatively in the preceding 4 years.
Explanation 1(b) – Employment Abroad Relief
For an Indian citizen “being outside India, coming on a visit”, Section 6(1)(c)’s 60-day threshold is replaced by 182 days, allowing longer visits without triggering residency.
Conventional understanding: NRIs could visit India up to 181 days/year without losing NRI status.
Facts of the Case
-
Exit year (FY 2019-20 in Bansal’s case): Binny Bansal spent >182 days in India before moving to Singapore → Resident under 6(1)(a).
-
Subsequent years: Returned for 60–181 days → Did not qualify for Explanation 1(b) substitution.
-
DTAA Relief (India–Singapore): Denied, as domestic law governs residency first.
ITAT Holding: Explanation 1(b) applies only to those who were non-resident at the start of the year.
Result: Post-October 1 departures face a permanent 60-day residency trap, applicable indefinitely.
Key Legal Interpretation
-
Exit-Year Residency is Decisive
-
Leaving on or after 2 October with ≥182 days in India → Resident for that FY.
-
Pre-October exits can qualify as non-resident immediately.
-
-
Explanation 1(b) Cannot Apply Post-October
-
Post-October exits lose the 182-day substitution permanently.
-
-
Section 6(1)(c) Governs Future Visits
-
Any visit ≥60 days in a year triggers resident status.
-
365-day rolling rule ensures repeated taxation across years.
-
-
DTAA Relief is Secondary
-
Domestic law determines residency first; DTAA tie-breakers cannot override.
-
-
RNOR Status Offers Limited Relief
-
Post-exit RNOR (2–3 years) may reduce Indian taxation on foreign salary, but does not revive Explanation 1(b) for future visits.
-
Illustrative Examples – Salaried Employees vs Founders/ESOP Holders
| Profile | Exit Date | Days in India (Exit FY) | FY Exit Status | Subsequent Visit (days) | Status | Tax Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salaried Employee | 25 Sept 2025 | 180 | Non-Resident | 90 | Non-Resident | Foreign salary exempt; India salary taxed normally |
| Salaried Employee | 7 Oct 2025 | 200 | Resident | 90 | Resident | Foreign salary fully taxable; India salary taxed; cap visits <60 days/year |
| Founder / ESOP | 25 Sept 2025 | 180 | Non-Resident | 120 | Non-Resident | ESOP exercises exempt; foreign income exempt |
| Founder / ESOP | 7 Oct 2025 | 200 | Resident | 120 | Resident | ESOP vesting & foreign salary fully taxable; must cap India stays <60 days/year |
Observation: Even a single post-October 1 exit can permanently subject global income, ESOP gains, and salary to Indian taxation.
Practical Advisory – Managing Exit & Visits
-
Exit Timing is Critical
-
Leave before 2 October → secure Non-Resident status; future visits up to 181 days allowed.
-
Leave on/after 2 October → permanent 60-day visit cap; future global income exposed.
-
-
Track Cumulative Days
-
Post-October exits must maintain ≤59 days/year in India.
-
Monitor 4-year rolling total to avoid Section 6(1)(c) trigger.
-
-
Salary and ESOP Planning
-
Post-October exits: ESOP exercises & vesting, foreign salary, and other global income are fully taxable.
-
Pre-October exits: ESOPs & foreign salary generally remain exempt.
-
-
DTAA & RNOR Strategy
-
DTAA cannot override domestic residency rules.
-
RNOR status can reduce taxation but does not restore 182-day substitution.
-
-
High Court Appeal Considerations
-
Restrictive interpretation of “being outside India” could be challenged.
-
Permanent forfeiture of Explanation 1(b) may be argued as overreach.
-
Assessment Year Exposure
| Exit Type | Exit FY Status | Subsequent FY Risk | Future Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-October Exit | Non-Resident | Low | Visits up to 181 days/year; NRI benefits continue |
| Post-October Exit | Resident | High | Any visit ≥60 days triggers Resident; global income taxed indefinitely |
Bottom line: FY of departure sets the stage for all future assessment years, making timing more important than total days.
Conclusion – Exit Date Rules the Game
The Binny Bansal ruling is a structural shift in NRI tax planning:
-
Pre-October exits: Safe NRI path; 182-day visit flexibility; ESOP/salary benefits preserved.
-
Post-October exits: Lifetime 60-day cap; global income fully taxable; ESOPs & foreign salary exposed.
Actionable:
-
Plan exit date carefully.
-
Monitor future visits & rolling presence.
-
Structure salary, ESOP, and foreign income to mitigate permanent Indian tax liability.
Ignoring this ruling could permanently subject your worldwide income to Indian taxation—even with minimal visits.
