Monday, December 29, 2025

Peer Review – Complete Professional Protocol for Firms, Reviewers, and Staff

 By CA Surekha S Ahuja

(Aligned with ICAI Guidelines and Best Practices)

Peer Review is a collegial, system-focused quality assurance exercise, designed to enhance the robustness of a Practice Unit’s (PU) processes, documentation, and ethical compliance. It is not an audit, investigation, or disciplinary exercise, but a structured dialogue aimed at improving professional systems, while preserving client confidentiality and organizational dignity.

Role of the Peer Reviewer

The Peer Reviewer, typically a senior professional, is expected to:

  • Conduct the review independently, objectively, and courteously.

  • Evaluate the PU’s systems, procedures, and documentation frameworks, focusing on compliance with Standards on Auditing/Assurance, SQC 1 / SA 220, and ICAI Code of Ethics.

  • Select assurance engagements on a sample basis, strictly limited to the review period.

  • Maintain absolute confidentiality; observations are constructive and system-oriented, not punitive.

  • Retain only peer review questionnaires, checklists, professional notes, and non-client-specific firm manuals shared with consent.

Professional boundaries: The reviewer shall not copy, photograph, scan, remove, or email client files, nor use them as reviewer working papers. Full or unrestricted system/cloud access is not required.

Responsibilities of the Practice Unit

The Practice Unit ensures a structured, compliant, and cooperative environment:

  • Pre-review preparation: Submit completed Peer Review Questionnaire, assurance client list with fees, and a concise note on firm policies—independence, supervision, engagement quality review, acceptance, and documentation.

  • Controlled access: Client and engagement files are available only on-site or via controlled on-screen inspection, under supervision.

  • Confidentiality protection: Sensitive client information is masked as appropriate.

  • Coordination: A designated partner or senior supervises all interactions with the reviewer.

  • Constructive engagement: Facilitate factual clarifications and explanations, avoiding unsolicited interpretations or informal sharing.

Internal Staff SOP at the Practice Unit

Staff play a critical supporting role in maintaining professionalism and ensuring smooth review execution:

Do’s:

  • Familiarize themselves with review protocols and file organization.

  • Respond factually and courteously to reviewer queries via the designated partner/senior.

  • Ensure engagement files and firm records are complete, indexed, and ready for inspection.

  • Maintain strict client confidentiality at all times.

Don’ts:

  • Do not copy, photograph, scan, or transmit client records.

  • Do not provide passwords, system or cloud access.

  • Do not answer reviewer queries independently or beyond scope.

  • Do not remove or alter engagement files during or after the review.

Post-review obligations: Re-secure all records, implement follow-up instructions, and continue to maintain confidentiality of observed information.

Guiding Principles

  • Peer Review is a professional dialogue, not a fault-finding mission.

  • Controlled access, system-based assessment, and constructive feedback define an effective review.

  • Respect, professionalism, and confidentiality are the pillars that ensure trust, compliance, and continuous improvement.

Internal Caption:
“Professional restraint, system readiness, and cooperative engagement form the foundation of an effective Peer Review.”